The recent Globe and Mail interview with Michael Chabon is fantastic and a striking insight into how much fatherhood has changed in the last few decades.
Early in his new essay collection, Manhood for Amateurs , Michael Chabon offers a telling definition of what it means to be a dad: “A father is a man who fails every day.” Later, the author of the Pulitzer-winning The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier & Clay writes that, as a father, it’s his job to be a hypocrite. For Mr. Chabon, 46, a father of four and one of the most celebrated novelists of his generation, this fatherhood thing? It’s not easy. Whether he’s talking to his kids about drugs or struggling to understand his daughters, he always seems aware of his shortcomings as a father. He talked to The Globe and Mail about how aspiring to a higher standard makes men good dads.
As you point out in the book, the historical standard for being a good dad is really low. Why do dads get off so easy?
There’s certain minimum behaviours that have long been accepted as marking whether one is or is not a good father, and basically those consisted of paying to raise your children, paying for their upkeep and sticking around. And that’s it. Anything more than that would just push you into some kind of Super Dad category. It’s not fair.
Do you think it’s encouraged dads to stick to the minimum requirements?
It has been bad for men that the expectations put on fathers are so low. It’s been bad for them as sons and bad for them as fathers as well. It’s incredibly satisfying and fulfilling to care for your children. It’s tedious and irritating and overwhelming and boring and it can be drudgery, but it’s one of those things that having done them gives you a feeling of satisfaction.
There have been critics over the past few years who claim parents are as immature as their kids for playing the same video games and sharing an interest in the same popular culture as their children. But you seem to be really happy to be able to geek out with your kids over, say, a shared love of Dr. Who.
It’s incredibly pleasurable. And it’s bizarre and arbitrary to draw designations between saying it’s okay to sit down to watch Claude Rains movies with your kids but it’s somehow not okay to sit down and play video games with your kids.
How would you say your version of fatherhood differs from your dad’s generation?
The model for him was that you are the breadwinner and that you stick around. He did his best and his best was a lot better than what was necessarily expected of him. But he never took care of me in the sense of cleaned up after me when I was sick or bought me new pairs of shoes or combed my hair or any of that kind of stuff. And then when my parents divorced when I was 12 and he moved away, I didn’t have the physical presence either. I definitely grew up with a sense of a lack. That might be part of what has impelled me to try live up to a somewhat higher standard in terms of presence and in terms of caring for my kids.
How do you define being a good father?
To me it’s just a question of presence, but not in the mere physical sense of the term. I think that, in a way, has been the standard for a very long time, that physical presence is adequate or sufficient. To me, it’s about emotional presence. It’s a standard. It’s not something, God knows, that I always meet or even necessarily meet consistently. But it is a standard, just to try to be there for your kids.
As a Dad who loves to play video games with his kids, build Lego and fool around with his boys – couldn’t agree more. It is all about investing time (which, with the new job, I have not done enough of lately – DULY NOTED!). I have the book on order